home news topics photos press opinion donate contact


Freedom to Marry Day 2013

Highlighting the Bigotry of Those Who Oppose Equal Rights

GLN permalink 1-29-2013

With Illinois possibly on the cusp of finally winning equal marriage rights for same-sex couples, the Gay Liberation Network (GLN), Rainbow-Sash Movement and others will highlight the bigotry of Cardinal Francis George's rear-guard actions to defeat equality with a 10:30 AM, Sunday, February 10 protest in front of Holy Name Cathedral, 735 N. State Street, Chicago.

Cardinal Francis George

The Cardinal and hierarchy of the Catholic church -- as demonstrated by a recent appeal from the Knights of Columbus to oppose equal marriage rights in Illinois -- have been the most vocal political lobby against LGBTQ equal rights in Springfield and Chicago.

A key reason why the state of Illinois has never passed an anti-gay referendum or even seen one put on the ballot, is because of the efforts of some LGBT activists. We have bucked a national trend---rather than avoiding open criticism of anti-gay religious figures like George, we have made highlighting their bigotry a central plank of our campaign for equality.

In much more socially-progressive California, for example, it was only after the passage of Proposition 8 that many activists woke up to the fact that they should have made an issue of the Mormon Church and the Catholic bishops. In contrast, one of the hallmarks of GLN over the years has been its forthrightness in confronting Cardinal George and other bigoted religious leaders when most other pro-gay organizations shied away from controversy.

GLN's repeated demonstrations against the Illinois Family Institute's (IFI) Peter LaBarbera, highlighting LaBarbera's bigotry in pushing for a failed antigay marriage referendum and his championing of anti-immigrant and anti-gay -- and losing -- candidate Jim Oberweis, poisoned his reputation. Despite his ties to many leaders of the Illinois Republican Party, several archdioceses around the state declined to actively participate in his attempts to get an anti-gay referendum on the Illinois ballot. These failures undoubtedly played a role in LaBarbera's 2006 ouster from the IFI.

In a recent column in the newspaper of the Chicago Archdiocese, George himself noted the difficulties that the "bigot" label has produced for him in his campaign against legal equality: "The Church will be portrayed as 'anti-gay,' which is a difficult position to be in," and "those who know the difference between marriage and same-sex arrangements will be regarded as bigots."

All that is left for him to do is play the victim card, whining about how winning legal equality for LGBT people somehow limits his "religious liberty." After the passage of the civil unions bill in Illinois, George pompously predicted, "I expect to die in bed, my successor will die in prison and his successor will die a martyr in the public square."

But it is he who, as head of the National Conference of Catholic Bishops, spent tens of thousands backing the anti-gay referendums Proposition 8 in California and Question 1 in Maine. It is he who is on record comparing lesbians and gays to the KKK, and repeatedly defending that comparison before finally issuing what many considered an inadequate apology.

However much we, and the majority of lay Catholics, disagree with the church hierarchy's discrimination against women and LGBTs in the Church, it is the Church's right to be a discriminatory institution. We can vociferously disagree with that, but it is up to Catholics themselves to correct that situation. However, it is when church leaders attempt to shore up that discrimination in civil law, imposing their backward beliefs and strictures on Catholics and non-Catholics alike, that they especially become a target of protest and ridicule.

Please help support the protest by joining the Facebook page and inviting your others!

For more information about the February 10th protest, please call GLN at 773.209.1187 or email LGBTliberation@aol.com

Gay Liberation Network


This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.