Get on the Gay Liberation Network Mail List!
Email LGBTLiberation@aol.com and put Subscribe in the subject line.

Saturday, Feb. 4 - No War on Iran (or Syria, for that matter!) - 12 noon, Federal Plaza, corner of Adams and Dearborn Streets. Part of a national day of action. Besides GLN, this action is endorsed by World Can't Wait, ANSWER, Code Pink, Midwest Anti-War Mobilization, and the Buddhist Peace Fellowship. For more information call 773.209.1187
Sunday, February 12 - Freedom to Marry Day protest at 10:30 AM in front of Holy Name Cathedral, 735 N. State Street (just 1/2 block south of the "Chicago" Red Line el stop). Cardinal George's recent repeated comparisons of gay rights activists to the KKK are but the most outrageous in a long string of homophobic comments by him, the Pope and others in the hierarchy of the church. Worse -- in contrast to the majority of lay Catholics who SUPPORT equal rights -- the church leadership has lobbied heavily against every pro-LGBT piece of legislation ever to come down the pike. Bigotry is bigotry, whether it hides behind church robes or patriotic flags. Please join GLN at Freedom to Marry Day 2012! Facebook event: Oppose Cardinal George's Anti-Gay Bigotry - 2/12/12 http://www.facebook.com/events/222265764531615/
Saturday-Monday, May 19-21, 2012 - G8/NATO summits in Chicago. Many actions are being planned, including a mass march on Saturday, May 19th. The march will begin with a 12 Noon rally at Daley Plaza, 50 W. Washington Blvd, followed by a march to the McCorrmick Place site of the G8/NATO summits. Go to www.ChicagoMassAction.org for more info.
Oppose Cardinal George's Anti-Gay Bigotry on Freedom to Marry Day 2012 - 2/12/12
In Opposing the Right to Same-Sex Marriage, Catholic Leadership Opposes Laity and Wider Public
Cardinal George Falsely Pits LGBT Rights Against "Liberty of the Catholic Church"
GLN permalink 1-26-2012

On Sunday, February 12, please join in a protest against Cardinal George's anti-gay bigotry - 10:30 AM in front of Holy Name Cathedral, 735 N. State Street, Chicago. Support Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender equal rights!
Clerical Bullies Who Try to Limit Rights of Others Now "Victims"?
*** Writing in the January 15th issue of the official Archdiocesan newspaper, Chicago's Cardinal Francis George said he had "fear" that the so-called "liberty of the Catholic Church" is under attack.
As easily the single largest, and arguably most influential religious denomination in Chicago and Illinois, any notion of a "threat" to the Catholic Church here is patently absurd. What is true is that Cardinal George and the Church leadership internationally have used their considerable influence to try to stop civil rights for LGBTs.
*** In Rome in a January meeting with the diplomatic corps, Pope Benedict XVI condemned same-sex marriage as a "threat to humanity" and decried "policies aimed at marginalizing the role of religion in the life of society, as if it were a cause of intolerance."
No one is talking about the government forcing the church to celebrate same-sex marriages or other equal rights for LGBTs and women in the Church, any more than forcing the church to re-marry divorcees. What we are saying is that we will no longer allow religious bigots to determine the laws by which people of other faiths (or no faith) observe.
*** After the passage of the civil unions bill in Illinois, George pompously predicted, "I expect to die in bed, my successor will die in prison and his successor will die a martyr in the public square."
This gaseous, inflated rhetoric is the telltale language of clerics in retreat. They know that their parishioners are not with them, and neither is the wider public. With support for their anti-equality beliefs slipping, George and other church leaders cast themselves as "victims" and appeal for pity and acceptance on that basis.
It is a tired tactic we have seen before. What makes it so cynical and disingenuous is that these same highly placed and still-influential clerics deny the misery that their guilt-inducing rhetoric has caused.
Furthermore, not content to fulminate from the pulpit, they ignore their tax-exempt status and enter the political arena to try to influence legislation.
Cardinal George, for example, has opposed every advance for LGBT rights in Chicago, in Cook County, and across the state largely without success. Unfortunately, he has had more luck helping our enemies win victories in California and Maine, where anti-gay bigotry defeated marriage equality, at least for the short term.
- George attempted to kill LGBT inclusion as a "protected class" in the Illinois Human Rights Act, which now protects us from housing and employment discrimination.
- George opposed similar Cook County protections and the county's domestic partnership registry.
- George and other Catholic bishops circulated petitions in a failed effort to force an advisory referendum on "gay marriage."
- George vigorously opposed the Illinois Civil Unions Act, which is now law.
- George has blessed the Illinois Catholic Conference's effort to kill the passage of full-fledged same-sex civil marriage rights in the state.
- George, as head of the National Conference of Catholic Bishops, spent big money backing the anti-gay referendums Proposition 8 in California and Question 1 in Maine,.
Polls show that a majority of Catholics in the pews back LGBT rights. It is the hierarchy of the church that is out of step with the membership for which they falsely claim to speak.
We call upon Catholics, and all other people of good will, to join us in our demand for full legal equality in Illinois and nationwide. Join us on Freedom to Marry Day 2012:
10:30 AM
Sunday, February 12
735 N. State Street
Chicago
Countering Bigotry in Church Leadership
Chicago's Cardinal George recently got himself in hot water by comparing gay rights demonstrators to the KKK, then defending that comment on at least two occasions subsequently, before finally saying "sorry" in a short note posted on the Archdiocesan website. Joe Murray of the Catholic LGBT organization Rainbow Sash and Bob Schwartz of the Gay Liberation Network discuss their different takes on George's apology and how the church leadership has ranged itself against LGBT and women's rights. Originally broadcast January 13, 2012
FOX Chicago Sunday: Tracy Baim and Joe Murray Discuss Cardinal George's Comments on Pride Parade : MyFoxCHICAGO.com
Gay Rights Activist and publisher of the Windy City Times Tracy Baim is joined by Joe Murray, executive director of Rainbow Sash, to discuss Cardinal George's comments on the upcoming Gay Pride Parade.
Bradley Manning Exposed War Crimes & Helped End The Iraq War
"If Bradley Manning had committed war crimes, not exposed them, he would be a free man today." - Marjorie Cohn
"By exposing some of the worst atrocities committed by the U.S. Forces in Iraq, the documents prevented the Iraqi Government from agreeing to give our soldiers immunity, which is what Obama wanted, to continue the war rather than end the war, and therefore... If Bradley Manning is guilty of what he is accused of, he is also guilty of helping to end the Iraq War." - Marjorie Cohn
Originally broadcast September 9, 2011
Leaders of the G8 ("Group of 8") nations, generally the wealthiest in the world, will hold a summit in May 2012 in Chicago, along with the heads of the NATO military alliance. The meetings represent the single biggest confab of war-making leaders in many years, and if past meetings are any indication, a focus for 10's of thousands of protesters. Long-time anti-war activists and GLN members Bob Schwartz and Andy Thayer discuss why people should actively oppose the forthcoming G8 and NATO summits in Chicago.

http://www.cafepress.com/gayliberation
NEW GLN BIBLE-THUMPER T-SHIRTS!
Get your new GLN t-shirts to sure warm the hearts of your local Bible-thumpers:

CLICK HERE TO VIEW T-SHIRT GRAPHIC PDF
"The Bible says:
Slavery good.
Gays bad.
Snakes talk."
Available in sizes small to triple-X large.
$15 per shirt plus $4.50 flat-rate postage, no matter how many shirts you order.
Make your check payable to "GLN" and mail it to:
GLN BIBLE T-SHIRT OFFER
4404 N Magnolia, Ste 420
Chicago, IL 60640
Adbusters Wants 50,000 G8/NATO Protesters in Chicago
By Lisa Balde and Phil Rogers | Thursday, Jan 26, 2012 | 5 NBC Chicago - LINK
GLN permalink 1-26-2012
The activist group that helped initiate Occupy Wall Street is rallying troops for a "big bang in Chicago" ahead of the G8/NATO summits this May.
In a statement issued Thursday, Adbusters called on 50,000 people to descend on the city to "set up tents, kitchens, peaceful barricades" and join Occupy Chicago for a month leading up to the May 15-22 summits expected to draw 7,500 officials.
"With a bit of luck, we'll pull off the biggest multinational occupation of a summit meeting the world has ever seen," the statement read.
"And this time around we're not going to put up with the kind of police repression that happened ... nor will we abide by any phony restrictions the City of Chicago may want to impose on our first amendment rights. We'll go there with our heads held high and assemble for a month-long people's summit ... we'll march and chant and sing and shout and exercise our right to tell our elected representatives what we want ... the constitution will be our guide.
And when the G8 and NATO meet behind closed doors on May 19, we'll be ready with our demands: a Robin Hood Tax ... a ban on high frequency 'flash' trading ... a binding climate change accord ... a three strikes and you're out law for corporate criminals ... an all out initiative for a nuclear-free Middle East ... whatever we decide in our general assemblies and in our global internet brainstorm - we the people will set the agenda for the next few years and demand our leaders carry it out.
And if that doesn't happen? Adbusters promises flash mobs in the streets, the shutdowns of campuses and corporate headquarters, and making "the price of doing business as usual too much to bear."
"We want to get within sight and sound of the G8 and NATO conference," said protest organizer Andy Thayer. "If people can't hear you, what good is the first amendment?"
It almost goes without saying that whatever happens, it will test the mettle, and restraint, of protesters and police alike.
"Certain people want to be arrested," says Debra Kirby, the Chicago Police Department's Chief of International Relations. "When you violate the law, we will accommodate you. You will be arrested."
In a way, they are the two opposing bookends of the big event in Chicago on the third weekend in May. Thayer, the pro-forma face of the opposition, insists the predictions of violence are overblown. He said familiar scenes like those of the chaos at the World Trade Organization conference in Seattle, were the fault of police, not protesters.
"Norm Stamper, the former chief of police, wrote a whole book about how the city screwed up," said Thayer. "Stamper said the overwhelming amount of violence in that case was caused by the police department themselves."
Thayer insisted that suggestions of mayhem, and calls for downtown businesses to prepare for the worst are nothing but hype; if there is trouble in Chicago's streets, he said, the mayor and police will be responsible.
"We've got police blogs that are now bragging about how they're going to violate people's rights here," he said. "Do we hear Debra Kirby, or other officials saying this is absolutely wrong, we've got to stop this kind of conduct?"
In a week where still another multi-million dollar payout against police was approved, Thayer predicted the conference in May could get expensive.
"This city's going to be on the hook for millions of dollars, post NATO/G8, because it doesn't control its own officers," he said.
For her part, Kirby rejected those suggestions, and said she is going to great lengths to make certain that her officers know the boundaries of what kind of protests are allowed, and when those protests become scenarios where arrests are necessary.
"We've equipped our officers with a full understanding of the law and what is happening within the current landscape around First Amendment protest and activity," she said.
She added:
"We have enlisted heavily in training our officers, and allowing them to understand that sometimes they are there to have verbal abuse thrown at them."
Indeed, said said she sees hers as a twofold mission, facilitating protests and keeping the peace.
"Certain activities that are engaged with, by what I'm going to say are criminal activists, as opposed to protesters, have certain traits and similarities, and that's what we're training our officers to look for," she said. "For the officers that we anticipate will be on the front line, they are receiving over 40 hours of training."
It would appear that right now there is very little common ground. Kirby said she is determined to balance the rights of the protesters to get their message out, against the needs of the rest of Chicago and the protection of her officers. Thayer said he finds it ironic that some fear violence from his fellow demonstrators, considering others who have been invited to attend.
"We're talking Vladmir Putin of Russia, who's cracking heads in Moscow right now," he said. "You want to talk about violence? Why are these people coming to Chicago?"
This week, the Chicagoland Chamber of Commerce president warned stores along State Street and the Mag Mile to add additional security and allow employees to work from home.
City officials fought that sentiment during a press conference the next day, saying they plan to use the summit to showcase the city, saying "this is not 1968."
But there already have been rumblings about protester frustration with Mayor Rahm Emanuel's handling of First Amendment rights. Some anti-G8 protesters have even said they'll sue the city.
In response Emanuel backed off this month on proposed increased fines for those convicted of resisting arrest. But the City Council approved other measures last week despite loud shouts from protesters.
Adbusters on Thursday didn't appear to be backing down. In closing, the activist group called for protesters to "pack your tents, muster up your courage and prepare for a big bang in Chicago this Spring."
Emanuel has said Chicago is working with the Secret Service and Federal Security Planning teams to establish an official protest area where the City "will provide sound amplification equipment, portable toilets, and other resources for protesters who wish to use it."
Mayor 1%'s new rules try to thwart protest, while groundswell of public dissent grows
by Andy Thayer and Christine Geovanis
GLN permalink 1-21-2012
In the last ten days, literally thousands of people from across Chicago and beyond rallied a massive amount of public outcry against efforts to restrict free speech and the right to dissent in Chicago.

To help folks separate spin from fact, we've put together this analysis to help you understand how local rules have changed in ways that undercut protest and political speech. While these revisions will not deter us from speaking out and protesting, they do change the excuses the police may use to try to prevent us from protesting.
It's also important that we understand these changes so we can educate our friends and neighbors -- and fight for meaningful change that puts people's rights and the greater good ahead of the fear-mongering and greed that drove Mayor 1%'s push for these changes.
City Hall made only token changes to "improve" these revisions, and the worst of Mayor 1%'s proposed revisions remain. While the old protest ordinance was pretty terrible in its own right, the changes approved this week make it even worse. How? Because the revisions give the police more excuses to target protesters they don't like and speech they oppose with greater fines and penalties. The revisions also give police more excuses to try and censor the tools we use to speak out -- sound equipment, signs, banners and whatnot.
Let's be clear, under the old ordinance, police routinely repressed speech they disliked anyway. More than a few protesters have been arrested for absolutely no reason, only to find that the police have cooked bogus charges as an afterthought -- and an excuse for targeting them in the first place.
But few aldermen or reporters understand the problems with the OLD ordinance, and they certainly have no experience with the police department's chronic selective enforcement of the rules. Most have taken Mayor 1% at his word on the impact of these changes -- setting them up for serious buyers' remorse once City Hall starts using these changes as an excuse to suppress political speech.
It's also important to note that Mayor 1%'s latest efforts to suppress our civil liberties do not occur in a vacuum. For the past several months, personnel from the Department of Homeland Security, the FBI and the Secret Service have been on the ground in Chicago working to coordinate overall security measures for the NATO/G8 summits -- and have made recommendations to municipal authorities on how to "enhance" these security measures.
This occurs at a time when Obama has signed the National Defense Authorization Act and other repressive measures, and where strong evidence exists of a nationally coordinated, inter-city campaign to suppress the Occupy movement. The National Lawyers Guild and its legal partners have filed a series of Freedom of Information requests seeking evidence of this federal role in the Occupy crackdown, and they have painted an ugly picture of federal coordination at the highest levels to undermine the most basic precepts of our right to dissent.
We "strongly suspect that the 72 so-called Fusion Centers created by the Homeland Security Department around the country, and the many Joint Terror Task Forces operated by the FBI in conjunction with local police in many cities, are serving as coordination points for the increasingly systematic attacks on the Occupy Movement," writes the Guild.
Inevitably, much of this will be litigated in the courts. Meanwhile, this latest effort by Mayor 1% and his yes-men and women -- as well as his national federal partners -- will not deter the legitimate right of the rest of us to speak our minds, raise our grievances and protest government policy, whether or not new "rules" give the police another excuse to try to censor us.
We may not have won on Wednesday, but every single person who spoke out, showed up, shot off an email or phoned their alderman has joined a growing groundswell of truly grassroots opposition to the abuse of power. And that is very, very powerful.
The 1% can make new rules. We honor a higher law and more fundamental freedoms: the human right to equality, dignity and peace with justice, the human right to challenge those who rip us off, undercut our health and safety and abuse our basic freedoms, and the human right to defend these freedoms with words and deeds.
Basic talking points - what has changed with the new ordinances
1. We defeated the increased penalties for "resisting arrest," but Chicago's onerous interpretation of what constitutes "resisting" remains, overly penalizing many forms of non-violent civil disobedience. The penalties remain a minimum fine of $25 and a maximum of $500.
2. The City originally wanted minimum violations of the parade permit and public assembly ordinances to jump 20-fold, from $50 to $1000, and double the maximum penalty from $1000 to $2000, while keeping in place the maximum jail time penalty of 10 days. The new ordinances will make the minimum fine "only" quadruple, to $200, while keeping in place the current maximum penalties of $1000 and/or 10 days in jail. The old ordinance was used to exact a "free speech tax" on messages the City disliked, and so the new ordinance just makes that much worse, while providing additional criteria to find alleged "violations."
3. The new parade permit ordinance proposed in December and the revised version floated January 12th both required that organizers provide in their permit application -- something typically prepared months before the event -- "a description of any recording equipment, sound amplification equipment, banners, signs, or other attention-getting devices to be used in connection with the parade."
Besides being logistically unworkable, this was an obvious 1st Amendment restriction. The great "concession" in the new ordinance is that it demands that organizers include in the permit application "a description of any sound amplification or other equipment that is on wheels or too large to be carried by one person, and a description of the size and dimension of any sign, banner or other attention-getting device that is too large to be carried by one person, to be used in connection with the parade." [emphasis ours]
4. The "reformed" version of the legislation is thus only a slightly less obvious 1st Amendment restriction and begs the question, will parade organizers be required to ban "unauthorized" banners under threat of fine and/or jail time?
Speaking at the City Council's Committee on Special Events, Cultural Affairs and Recreation meeting on Tuesday, Michelle T. Boone, the Commissioner of the Department of Cultural affairs and Special Events, tried to soft-pedal this provision by implying that there would be no penalty for violation of it. But if that's so, why include the provision in the ordinance at all?
5. By changing the definition of what constitutes a "large parade," the new ordinance slips in onerous insurance and other burdens on demonstration organizers. Unless one gets a financial waiver from the Commissioner of Transportation, every street march in the downtown area will require $1 million liability insurance and "indemnify the city against any additional or uncovered third party claims against the city arising out of or caused by the parade; and (3) agree to reimburse the city for any damage to the public way or to city property arising out of or caused by the parade." Failure to provide proof of insurance with one's permit application will be grounds for rejection of the application.
6. Under the new ordinance, one can apply to the Commissioner of Transportation for a waiver of the financial requirements "if the application is for an activity protected by the 1st Amendment to the United States Constitution [virtually every activity is protected by the 1st Amendment] and the requirement would be so financially burdensome that it would preclude the applicant from applying for a parade permit for the proposed activity. An application for a waiver of the application fee or insurance requirement shall be made on a form prescribed by and contain reasonable proof acceptable to the commissioner."
There is no definition as to what constitutes "reasonable proof acceptable to the commissioner." Moreover, both the old and new versions of the ordinances allow the Transportation Commissioner to "establish...rules and regulations" in addition to those specified in the legislation - i.e., a virtual blank check to institute unpopular measures that might have difficulty passing the City Council.
7. The new ordinance repeats most of the bureaucratic limitations on "public assembly" that were contained in the old ordinance. The city defines "public assembly" as any gathering that does not use the street, but does use sidewalks and "which is reasonably anticipated to interfere with or impede the flow of pedestrian traffic."
When a member of the public raised concern about this during a City Council committee meeting, Boone tried to allay the concern by noting that the language had been lifted wholesale from the old ordinance and that "they [the police] don't enforce a lot of it." The reality is that there has been very selective enforcement of this provision of the old ordinance, amounting to a 1st Amendment content-based restriction.
By making the public assembly provisions a new subsection of the Municipal Code, the City will either enforce the old provisions against everyone, or continue its selective enforcement. Either result is a serious retreat away from the 1st Amendment.
8. The deputizing of police authority, perhaps even to private security outfits, remained intact in the legislation as passed. There is no sun-set clause on this provision.
9. The only "temporary" ordinance concerns the issuance of no-bid contracts. It is important to make sure that this truly goes away on July 30th as provided for in the legislation as passed.
Transparency
Emanuel claimed that his mayoralty would have "the most open, accountable, and transparent government that the City of Chicago has ever seen." As many have commented, given Chicago's history, that's hardly setting the bar very high. Our struggle has given the lie to Mayor 1%'s claims of transparency:
a) The approximately half-dozen aldermen in the Committee on Special Events, etc. apparently had the latest version of the parade permits ordinance when they passed it out of committee on Tuesday afternoon. It was announced that paper copies of it would be distributed to them at the start of that meeting. When one of us asked for a show of hands during public comment section as to who had read it, all six or so claimed they had.
The fact remains, though, that the "latest" versions of the legislation that the City Clerk's office gave us 90 minutes before the Council vote on Wednesday were outdated, and as of yesterday, the Clerk's website still only had the old versions. So there was no way the general public had access to what was being voted on and thus have the opportunity to meaningfully weigh in on them.
b) As noted above, there is only one item in the whole body of legislation that has a sunset clause. This legislation then was not just for G8/NATO, as Emanuel claimed. In a January 17 City Council committee meeting, Mike Simon of the CDOT said that the permits ordinance revisions had been in the works since 2009. As one of us said to Tunney after the committee meeting, they've had this under review for two years and they've apparently talked to all players except those who actually use the ordinance.
c) The January 12th not-for-attribution press briefing (with no paper copies of what the revisions were) was accepted with virtually no criticism by the City Hall beat press crew. This was as much a statement about them as it was about Emanuel. Right up to and after Wednesday's vote, most accepted City Hall's spin that there were dramatic concessions to our side in the revised legislation.
d) Next up in the transparency department what are the G8/NATO summits going to cost city taxpayers? Mayor 1% said that "We'll make sure that taxpayers don't take on the bill" and in a Council committee meeting, Alderman Pope falsely claimed that "Historically host cities have been wholly reimbursed." But wholesale violations of protesters' rights by police have typically cost host cities millions in civil suits after the fact.
Win, lose, or somewhere in between?
Finally, there is the issue of whether or not to call what happened on Wednesday a "victory" for our side or not. Most (but not all) mainstream media accounts accepted the 5th floor's spin that Mayor 1% had listened to the people and revised the legislation to address our concerns a victory for protesters. We obviously don't think so, but at the same time, it would be wrong to label what happened as a wholesale defeat.
It is standard operating procedure for the City is to introduce draconian measures to the CTA, etc. in so-called "doomsday" budgets, only to then walk back the cuts to more "acceptable" levels once there is public outcry the "acceptable" levels being the ones they planned on instituting all along. But we don't think that this was the initial plan for this legislation "professional protesters" (their term) are not a group in the chain of power that they think merits any concessions. We think that they introduced the legislation in the form that they wanted it to pass, and were taken aback at the level of resistance our side was able to muster.
There was no advance plan for the January 12th Mayoral dog-and-pony shows. Those and the other spin measures were crafted in response to our resistance, and the City had to deliver at least minimal concessions in order to make them credible. If we had not fought, we would not have won anything.
Aside from the teachers and those fighting the health clinic cuts, we were the first group to take the new mayor on in a sustained battle. And we're really not a group at all - many thousands of people who did not know each other united in opposition to the mayor's plans. As with any new administration, there are always those in the public who hope that the new guy will be better than the old one, that he can be reasoned with, etc. This was an uphill battle on those grounds alone.
Our sustained battle on this issue helped take Emanuel's credibility down at least a few notches, concretizing his reputation as Mayor 1%. Moreover, we sent the message that if the City messes with us, we will fight back tenaciously. Given the rubber stamp nature of our City Council (reinforced by Emanuel's deep pockets, etc.), the idea that anyone could defeat him first time out was a total long-shot. Thanks to this struggle, the odds of people defeating him on other issues in the future have gotten at least a little bit better.
Previous articles in this series can be found here, here, here and here.
Here are links to the new versions of the ordinances:
G8NATOSub.pdf (75 k)
Parade & public assembly ordinances, new.pdf (56 k)
G-8 protest organizer agent of 'change' or 'pain in the butt'?
BY KIM JANSSEN Staff Reporter kjanssen@suntimes.com - LINK
January 16, 2012 5:44PM
Updated: January 16, 2012 11:33PM
GLN permalink 1-16-2012
Andy Thayer, is a key figure in the upcoming G8 protests and a veteran protestor for many causes, including gay rights and anti-war. | Tom Cruze~Sun-Times
Andy Thayer's co-workers are running an office pool.
How long until he gets arrested?
Most of us would take offense, but Thayer is one of the guys authorities most expect to cause trouble at the G-8 and NATO summits in May. To him, it's a badge of honor.
"I'm staying out of it," the veteran activist says with a laugh of his colleagues' teasing.
Battle-hardened after more than 30 years as the megaphone-carrying face of non-violent Chicago street protests against everything from police brutality to Wall Street greed to the war in Iraq, the media-savvy 51-year-old rarely stays out of anything for long.
In the last two weeks alone he's had the better of public spats with Cardinal Francis George, who apologized for comparing the gay rights movement to the Ku Klux Klan, and with Mayor Rahm Emanuel, who admitted he'd understated the scope of proposed laws targeting protesters.
In the next two weeks Thayer is due to be a witness in a federal civil rights lawsuit that challenges the Chicago Police Department's handling of a 2003 anti-war protest, and to be a noisy antagonist in the City Council's vote on Emanuel's proposed protest restrictions.
Police critics mock him as a publicity hound who'd call a rally to protest a parking ticket.
But ever since President Barack Obama announced that the G-8 and NATO will meet in Chicago, Thayer has been meeting almost daily with dozens of other activists to plot a demonstration they hope will draw a coalition of tens of thousands of protesters from across the globe during the May 19-21 summit. As the author of a protest permit application that seeks to march the crowd to within a few yards of the world's leaders at McCormick Place, he's likely to be thrust into his brightest spotlight yet this summer.
Emanuel has repeatedly said that protestors' First Amendment rights won't be compromised by the security needs of the summit and that he has no interest in a 2016 presidential run.
But Thayer - who has a history degree - says he and other protesters plan to use a lesson they've drawn from the clashes outside the 1968 Democratic National Convention that damaged Mayor Richard J. Daley's national reputation.
"The 1968 DNC destroyed Hubert Humphrey's chance of becoming president," he says in the cluttered West Town office that he's decorated with an Arab Spring-inspired Egyptian flag.
"The G-8 is Obama's homecoming and Rahm's national coming out party. Rahm hopes it will be his springboard to the 2016 nomination. We want them both to pay the highest political price for bringing the biggest collection of fraudsters, banksters and warmongers ever to meet in Chicago."
Lifelong dissent
If the specter of 1968 looms over the upcoming summit, Thayer's a little too conventional for the role that hairy counter-culture icon Abbie Hoffman played in that drama.
Thayer prefers the fitted T-shirts, sensible glasses and neat haircut that befit a middle-aged gay man whose day job is office manager for the law firm Loevy & Loevy. He's quick to agree that he's only one of many organizers, and that G-8 NATO protestors will march for a plethora of causes, including an "Occupy" coalition that emphasizes collective action over individual leadership.
For all that, his whole life might have been building to this moment.
Raised in a small town in upstate New York by his father, who designed missile parts, and his mother, an activist who secretly helped Vietnam draft dodgers escape to Canada, he was a misfit from the start.
His mother's commitment to "take risks for what she believed in" left a mark, he says. By the age of 17, he'd written articles exposing corruption, articles that upset his teachers so much that they closed the high school newspaper.
It was in Chicago that his activism flourished. Enrolled as a journalism student at Northwestern University in 1978, he was sent to cover a protest at the gates of ComEd's Zion nuclear power plant. Instead he joined in and was arrested and charged with trespassing and eventually was acquitted by a Lake County jury, which found that the protesters' actions were necessary to prevent a greater harm to the public.
The experience was "exhilarating and scary," he says.
Thayer took a hiatus from Northwestern when he came out of the closet - he now lives in Uptown with his partner - but became a campus leader upon his return, protesting against the school's investments in apartheid South Africa.
By the 1990s he was a leading voice against police brutality and for the Gay Liberation Network, which he co-founded.
He's since been arrested for everything from demanding gay rights in Moscow to attempting to stop President George W. Bush's motorcade in the Loop. Convicted of misdemeanor resisting arrest in 1989 and again in 2005, he had three other minor cases thrown out, and was cleared of more serious charges of aggravated battery of a police officer in 2009 after video evidence undermined the case against him.
He's taken on beloved conservative institutions - the Chicago Boy Scouts Council lost most of its funding from United Way in 2001 after Thayer led protests against the scouts' policies on homosexuality - but also infuriated elements of the left, including other gays angered by his support of the deported Muslim cleric Rabbih Haddad.
But it was his leading role in the raucous anti-Iraq war march of March 20, 2003, that may offer the best clues into how he'll react in the heat of the moment this May.
2003 clash
The freewheeling protest, in which 10,000 demonstrators without perrmits followed Thayer and other leaders onto Lake Shore Drive, blocking traffic hours after the U.S.-led bombing of Iraq began, has faded from popular memory.
But Thayer isn't alone in his estimation of its significance.
"That was the first time since 1968 that an anti-war demonstration got out of control on the city's streets," says retired Deputy Supt. Jim Maurer, who was Chicago Police's Chief of Patrol at the time. "They literally overran the police lines."
Police claimed they'd negotiated an ad hoc deal with leaders of the march to avoid the Drive, but Thayer and other protesters denied it. At least 540 were arrested, though only 351 were charged and most had their cases dropped. Nine years later, it's still an open wound between police and protesters, who brought a federal civil rights case that's set to go to trial later this month.
One former top Chicago law enforcement official whose run-ins with Thayer include the 2003 protest, angrily describes him as "self-serving - not as interested in the cause as he is in attention for himself."
But both Maurer and Pat Camden, who was then the Chicago Police spokesman and now represents the Fraternal Order of Police, view Thayer with a mixture of amused contempt and grudging respect. "He always wanted to be arrested, and we often accommodated him," says Maurer, who describes Thayer as a "gigantic pain in the butt for law enforcement."
"Like the mosquitoes that are all over the place when you go on a fishing trip," is how Camden describes Thayer's role in our democracy. "They're always there and they never go away - he's certainly persistent."
Both concede that Thayer is not violent and has a right to make his point. "You have to take him seriously because he's tried to provoke the police department on many occasions," Maurer said. "He provokes like-minded people who want to cause trouble."
In their view, police exercised considerable restraint in 2003 and will do so again during the G-8.
Thayer, who says the Chicago Police Department has "an international reputation for brutality," drew a different conclusion. Police's failure to control the 2003 crowd spooked the White House enough that it decided not to hold the 2004 G-8 in Chicago, he believes, crediting the protest as "a great success."
Though he blames police for the violence at the 1968 convention and the "Battle of Seattle" at the 1999 World Trade Organization summit, he also acknowledges that civil disobedience played a role in both, as it did in 2003.
He expects non-violent civil disobedience in May's protests, which he says Chicagoans should feel safe enough to bring their children to. The 2003 protest offers a model of how the mayor might lose the street at a peaceful event, he suggests.
It was the protesters' energy, not their numbers, that made the difference in that case, he says. "I've been in marches of 300,000 that were flat, but the air was electric that night," he said. "We knew we wouldn't stop the war, but we told President Bush, 'You ignored our voices, now you’ll have to ignore our bodies.'"
99 versus 1
Thayer hasn't voted for an electable national candidate in decades. He scoffs at the idea that the G-8 nations of the U.S., Japan, Germany, the United Kingdom, France, Italy, Canada and Russia are truly democratic and believes that "meaningful change only comes up from the street and the grassroots."
He points to a range of issues, from the North American Free Trade Agreement's effects on Mexican farming through the trillions of dollars spent on NATO's war in Afghanistan to the closures of schools and libraries in Chicago, as reasons why people should show up to May's protests. For him, they're all connected.
Simply put, he says: "This is the 99 percent versus the one percent who start all wars and rule in their own interests, the wealthiest one percent who live in palaces while holding the rest of us down."
Predicting just how many heed that call is difficult. The Seattle protests attracted a minimum of 35,000; just a few thousand demonstrated at this year's G-8 in Deauville, France; while at least 400,000 marched through downtown Chicago for immigrant rights in 2006.
Thayer's application for a parade from Daley Plaza to the western boundary of the summits' location, McCormick Place, predicted only 5,000. But organizers seeking to calm authorities' fears and preempt claims of failure have an incentive to set a low bar. Privately, they say they'll be disappointed if tens of thousands do not take to the streets.
By contrast, Police Supt. Garry McCarthy's comments that 13,000 officers are training for mass arrests, and Emanuel's attempts to increase restrictions and possible fines on protesters are designed to scare away the everyday Chicagoans who would make the bulk of any large crowd, according to Keeanga-Yamahtta Taylor, an activist with Communities United Against Foreclosure and Eviction.
A diverse group of similar left-wing groups, including Iraq Veterans Against The War, the Committee To Stop FBI Repression, Students For A Democratic Society and the Chicago Network to Send a US Boat to Gaza, are among those regularly meeting to organize the protest. Protesters from across the nation, from Canada, the U.K. and Germany are also coordinating. But the size of the crowd may depend in large part on how actively the unions get involved in an election year action against a Democratic president they helped elect.
It also remains to be seen whether immigrant rights activists can convince their community that the G-8 is a worthwhile target. Past actions against the G-8 have been overwhelmingly white.
Harder still to predict are the intentions of hard-line anarchists, who have little respect for Thayer and the leftist coalition. Anonymous chat about a minority forming a lawless "black bloc" within the main body of the march - as happened in 1999, when anarchists dressed in black smashed stores in downtown Seattle - is rife on anarchist websites. In a sign that police are taking the risk seriously, officers were recently requested to report the locations of anarchist graffiti across the city.
Thayer admits the responsibility he and other activists feel to mobilize a successful protest "keeps me awake at night."
But if Chicago wants to know if there will be trouble when the G-8 and NATO hit town, he's remaining coy.
"It depends how you define 'trouble,' " Thayer grins. "Rahm Emanuel's idea of trouble might just turn out to be a lot of people's idea of fun."
Chicago grants 1st parade permit ahead of G-8, NATO
Associated Press Wire Report
Friday, January 13, 2012
GLN permalink 1-13-2012
CHICAGO Chicago officials said Jan. 12 that they approved the first parade permit to protesters ahead of meetings set for May of the leading industrial nations and sought to quell critics' concerns that proposed changes to city laws will step on demonstrators' First Amendment rights.
The back-to-back G-8 and NATO summits will be held in Chicago May 19-21 the first time in more than three decades a city has hosted both meetings and tens of thousands of protesters are expected to greet the expected 7,500 delegates from up to 80 nations. Costs for the event could reach $65 million, officials said.
Mayor Rahm Emanuel's challenge is to keep order and showcase the city to the world, while also allowing protesters with varying agendas to have a voice. Top aides to the mayor promised Jan. 12 that the city would protect protesters' freedoms and even go so far as to provide plenty of portable toilets and sound amplification systems to them.
"As the city of Chicago issues permits for these events, we stand is strong support of the applicant organizations' First Amendment right to protest," Emanuel said in a statement.
At an unusual briefing for reporters held Jan. 12 at City Hall, officials and the head of the summit host committee released more details about planning for the gatherings, which have drawn massive and unruly protests elsewhere. But much remains uncertain, including the official site of many summit events and U.S. Secret Service security perimeters.
Details such as road closures and parking restrictions may not be known until two to four weeks before the event, said Frank Benedetto of the Secret Service's Chicago field office in a statement.
The host committee and the city have estimated the summits could cost $40 million to $65 million and would be paid by donations from the private sector and federal funds, not by local taxpayers. Officials would not release fundraising goals.
The briefing came days before two Chicago City Council committees were expected to consider proposed security measures related to the NATO and G-8 summits. On Jan. 12, city officials said they've revised some of those proposals to respond to critics worried about infringements to First Amendment rights.
For example, they are dropping a proposal to raise the maximum fine for a violation of the parade ordinance and eliminating a requirement for parade marshals for every 100 participants. They are leaving the time of a parade at two hours and 15 minutes, instead of cutting it to two hours.
Another proposed ordinance would give the Chicago police chief the power to deputize trained law enforcement officers from other states to help with security, close public parks for two hours longer than usual each day, and speed up certain procurement requirements to deal with last-minute purchasing needs.
So far, two groups have submitted four requests for permits for protest events, and Emanuel's office announced the approval of the first such permit Jan. 12. It went to the Coalition Against the NATO/G-8 War and Poverty Agenda, also called CANG8.
City officials said Jan. 12 that they'll approve two other permits soon, one for a rally planned by CANG8 and another for an event planned by National Nurses United, the nation's largest nurses union. A fourth permit request, also from the nurses group, will be denied because it conflicts with CANG8's Daley Plaza event, officials said, but they'll work to find the nurses an alternative site.
The Secret Service will oversee security for the summits and may designate security zones that impact the protest permits. If that happens, the mayor said, the city pledges to work with protesters to find other rally sites and protest routes.
The mayor's promise wasn't enough for activists. Protest leader Andy Thayer said Jan. 12 that the city's pledge of an alternate route if the Secret Service plans a security zone for the approved route is an unacceptable "escape clause."
"We reject the notion that the Secret Service should reject permits that have already been approved," Thayer said in a statement.
Gay rights protest is held despite cardinal's apology
Handful of activists demonstrate outside cathedral
By Erin Meyer, Chicago Tribune reporter - LINK
12:01 a.m. CST, January 9, 2012
GLN permalink 1-9-2012
Despite an apology from Cardinal Francis George for recently likening the church's clash with the gay rights movement to the anti-Catholicism of the Ku Klux Klan, a handful of gay rights activists demonstrated outside Holy Name Cathedral Sunday, saying his contrition wasn't enough.
"It is totally inadequate," said Andy Thayer, co-founder of the Gay Liberation Network, referring to the statement posted on the archdiocese's website Friday night. "When it came time to issue an apology he chose the most passive manner to do it. ... I would say it to his face."
George's controversial comments, broadcast on Fox Chicago TV, came in response to a question about whether next summer's gay pride parade would disrupt morning services at Our Lady of Mount Carmel Catholic Church in the Lakeview neighborhood.
"You know, you don't want the gay liberation movement to morph into something like the Ku Klux Klan, demonstrating in the streets against Catholicism," George told two Fox News reporters in an interview that aired on Christmas. "So I think if that's what's happening, and I don't know that it is, but I would respect the local pastor's, you know, position on that."
Three gay rights organizations had planned a protest outside Holy Name during the midday mass Sunday. They called off the protest after George issued his apology Friday.
"We asked for an apology, and we got an apology," said Joe Murray, executive director of the Rainbow Sash Movement, a group of gay and lesbian Catholics who believe they should receive Holy Communion. "From our perspective, it was a heartfelt apology."
Nick Costello, 41, a member of the Knights of Columbus and a parishioner at Holy Name, defended the cardinal to protesters Sunday.
"I think his apology was aimed at the hurt it caused," Costello said. "There is plenty of angry rhetoric (in the gay rights movement) directed at the cardinal."
emeyer@tribune.com
Copyright © 2012, Chicago Tribune
Gay Catholics Plan Protest Against Cardinal Over Comparison to Ku Klux Klan
Updated: Wednesday, 04 Jan 2012, 7:49 PM CST
Published : Wednesday, 04 Jan 2012, 7:46 PM CST
FOX Chicago News - LINK
GLN permalink 1-4-2012
Chicago - Gay Chicago Catholics plan to protest against Cardinal Francis George on Sunday over comments he made on FOX Chicago News comparing gay activists to the Ku Klux Klan.
The group Rainbow Sash will join with Equality Illinois and the Gay Liberation Network for a noontime protest on Jan. 8 at Holy Name Cathedral (730 N. Wabash).
On Dec. 21, Cardinal George talked with FOX Chicago News about the route for the 2012 Gay Pride Parade, a route that would have taken it by a Catholic church on a Sunday morning during mass.
"You don't want the Gay Liberation Movement to morph into something like the Ku Klux Klan, demonstrating in the streets against Catholicism," the Cardinal said.
Since then, some gay activists have demanded that the Cardinal resign.
Activist Andy Thayer
Chicago Tribune / January 3, 2012 - LINK
GLN permalink 1-3-2012
( Chris Walker, Chicago Tribune / January 3, 2012 )
Activist Andy Thayer, organizer for a group protesting the May G-8 and NATO meetings in Chicago, leads the way to apply for a parade permit application at City Hall.
Rahm Emanuel on duration of NATO-G8 rules: 'I made a mistake. Real simple, OK.'
By Fran Spielman City Hall Reporter fspielman@suntimes.com January 3, 2012 1:40PM LINK
Updated: January 3, 2012 10:34PM
GLN permalink 1-3-2012

Andy Thayer, representing the "Coalition Against the NATO and G8 War & Poverty Agenda" (CANG8) applies for a parade permit for May 19, 2012 to march from the Daley Plaza to McCormack Place. He is helped by Tieesha Rhoden, Asst. Commissioner Michael Simon and Susan Pawlak. Tuesday, January 3, 2012 - Brian Jackson~Sun-Times
Mayor Rahm Emanuel made an admission on Tuesday: He "made a mistake" when he claimed that extraordinary security measures he proposed to handle protesters who descend on Chicago for the NATO and G-8 summits would be temporary and repealed after the events are over.
The mayor's about-face apparently means the only thing temporary about the changes will be the power to purchase "goods, work or services" needed to host the May 15-22 event at McCormick Place without City Council approval.
But the other changes will be permanent. They include: dramatically higher fines for resisting arrest; more surveillance cameras; parks and beaches closed until 6 a.m.; sweeping parade restrictions and higher fees for those events and empowering Police Superintendent Garry McCarthy to "deputize law enforcement personnel" and forge cooperative agreements with a host of state, federal and local law enforcement agencies.
That's not what the mayor said last month when he introduced the changes at a City Council meeting. At that time, he emphatically stated that the changes he sought were "temporary," "one-time only" and "just for this conference."
"I made a mistake. Real simple, OK? I thought when I answered the question, I was answering the question about contracting, OK? So, if I made a mistake, I bear the responsibililty," the mayor said.
As he did last month, Emanuel flatly denied that the sky-high fines and 6 a.m. park and beach opening signaled an attempt to muzzle what's expected to be an international onslaught of protesters.
In Seattle, about 35,000 people protested a World Trade Organization meeting in 1999 and caused more than $2 million in damage to businesses. There were violent clashes between protesters and police in Pittsburgh during a G-20 summit in 2009.
"First Amendment rights will be protected. Public safety will be also protected, and I don't see the two in conflict at all," the mayor said.
That's not what the protesters were saying before applying for a permit to stage a massive May 19 march from Daley Center plaza to McCormick Place.
They demanded that Emanuel roll back the changes or risk waking up the ghosts of the 1968 Democratic National Convention in Chicago.
"I'm a veteran of 1968. I was one of the organizers when the whole world was watching, and I see some unfortunate parallels here," said political consultant Don Rose.
"The more pugnacious the city behaves, the more pugnacious they can expect as a response. This can be done peacefully. But mass repression appears to be on the threshold, and the city should be well beyond that by now."
Andy Thayer, a spokesman for the Coalition Against the NATO G-8 War and Poverty Agenda, branded Emanuel "Mayor One Percent" and argued that the mayor "lied" when he said the changes would be temporary not permanent.
Thayer offered as Exhibit "A" a proposed parade ordinance tailor-made to stifle all manner of public expression.
"Every single protest in the downtown area would be considered a 'major parade' with a whole series of ridiculous stipulations," he said. "Every single piece of sound equipment would need to be registered with the city a week in advance. You can't predict who's gonna show up with a bullhorn. They are also insisting on a full lineup of [participants] a week in advance.
"This does not just affect G-8 and NATO protesters. Everyone who's got a beef with the city or a private employer in this town is gonna be affected by this ordinance. They need to take this very seriously and say, 'We do not want to go back to these ridiculous restrictions and thuggish behavior in response to protests.' "
Thayer said he expects the city to deny the permit, setting the stage for a court fight.
Protest against Cardinal George planned
News posted Monday, Jan. 2, 2012
by Kate Sosin, Windy City Times - LINK
GLN permalink 1-2-2012
LGBT activists are planning a demonstration in front of Holy Name Cathedral, 730 N. Wabash Ave., in the wake of Cardinal Francis George's comments that compared the gay liberation movement to the Ku Klux Klan.
The protest, to be held at noon on Sunday, Jan. 8, is the first scheduled demonstration against George after he told Fox News Chicago that the gay-right movement was at risk of morphing "into something like the Ku Klux Klan, protesting in the streets against Catholicism." George has reiterated his controversial marks twice since the initial comment.
Leading the charge are LGBT groups Rainbow Sash Movement ( RSM ) and Gay Liberation Network.
"The RSM believes he seriously endangers the identity and unity of the Catholic Church by these bigoted actions," RSM said in a statement. "He brings a cloud of suspicion over the Archdiocese's commitment to the 10 pillars of Social Justice that the Church should be promoting."
The groups are asking that LGBT activists and allies turn out in solidarity.
Cardinal George challenged to debate at Center on Halsted
News update posted Dec. 29, 2011
by Kate Sosin, Windy City Times LINK
GLN permalink 12-29-2011
A Catholic LGBT leader has challenged Chicago Cardinal Francis George to a debate, after the cardinal compared the Pride Parade to a Klu Klux Klan gathering repeatedly in recent days.
Joe Murray, the executive director of the Rainbow Sash Movement ( RSM ) invited the archbishop to face off at the LGBT Center on Halsted on a day and time of his choosing.
In a statement, released by the RSM, the organization commends George for removing a message in which he compared the LGBT Pride Parade to a KKK protest from the Archdiocese of Chicago website.
George's message was his third public reference to the KKK in relation to the Chicago Pride Parade recently, after revisions to the parade route and time threatened to interrupt Sunday morning services at Our Lady of Mount Carmel Church in Lakeview.
"When the pastor's request for reconsideration of the plans was ignored, the organizers invited an obvious comparison to other groups who have historically attempted to stifle the religious freedom of the Catholic Church. One such organization is the Ku Klux Klan which, well into the 1940's, paraded through American cities not only to interfere with Catholic worship but also to demonstrate that Catholics stand outside of the American consensus."
Parade organizers and Our Lady of Mount Carmel Church came to an agreement approximately two weeks ago, after organizers agreed to push the start time of the parade back to noon.
George, however, reiterated his comments on Dec. 27, only to remove the statement from the page amid controversy.
"We want to encourage the Cardinal to now apologize for using an ill-advised metaphor of comparing the gay liberation movement to the KKK," RSM said in a statement. "The Cardinal only trivializes the history of Catholics being discriminated against in the past by making such an unreasonable association."
Windy City Times attempted to contact George after he initially told Fox News Chicago that he feared the Pride Parade could mirror the KKK in protesting Catholics. According to a Susan Burritt, a spokesperson for the Archdiocese of Chicago who responded to the inquiry on Dec. 28, "Cardinal George is on vacation and unavailable for comments."
Also out of the office this week is Father Thomas Srenn of Our Lady of Mount Carmel Church, who did not respond to requests from Windy City Times to comment on the cardinal's comparison. According to his voicemail, Srenn will return to work after Dec. 31.
Our Lady of Mount Carmel Church is home to Archdiocesan Gay and Lesbian Outreach , and Srenn said that his request to move the start time of the parade was not due the content of the parade, but rather the difficulty it created for worshippers attending church that morning. Srenn declined to comment on George's recent remarks when asked last week, but said that the compromise with Parade organizers satisfied the church's request.
Direct-action LGBT group Gay Liberation Network ( GLN ) voiced opposition to the Cardinal in a letter sent to Windy City Times. The organization has protested George in the past on Valentine's Day as part of National Freedom to Marry Day actions.
"We know that the Catholic laity are often supportive of LGBTs and our rights while the church leaders are not, and this is both threatening to the latter and a challenge," GLN wrote. "Their attacks against us are just as much an effort to win support from their parishioners as they are to score points against our movement."
As in past years, GLN will protest outside of Holy Name Cathedral on Feb. 14.
Gay rights group calls for Cardinal George to resign
Wednesday, December 28, 2011
ABC7News LINK
GLN permalink 12-28-2011

December 28, 2011 (CHICAGO) (WLS) -- Once again, Cardinal George has attempted to clarify remarks he made about gays and the Ku Klux Klan, which have only served to keep the controversy going.
The cardinal's original comments involved next summer's gay pride parade and whether it would interfere with services at a Lakeview Catholic church. He compared the possible interference with Catholic worship to KKK parades last century.
Over the weekend the cardinal attempted to clarify. He said then it is absurd to compare gays and lesbians to the Klan, and he added he was only comparing parades to parades, not people to people.
Now the cardinal has released another statement saying, "The organizers invited an obvious comparison to other groups who have historically attempted to stifle the religious freedom of the Catholic church. One such organization is the Ku Klux Klan, which, well into the 1940's, paraded through American cities not only to interfere with Catholic worship but also to demonstrate that Catholics stand outside of the American consensus."
Wednesday afternoon, the Gay Liberation Network said it is outraged at the comparison and called for the cardinal's resignation.
Equality Illinois responded to George with a statement: "The Cardinal is making this a political issue as a last-ditch effort to quash the progress that the LGBT movement has made in recent years."
Group rallies against proposals to increase fines for protesting
Delal Pektas | Dec. 22, 2011
WBEZ 91.5 LINK
GLN permalink 12-22-2011
A group protested at Chicago's City Hall today to rally against some proposals from Mayor Rahm Emanuel. Those proposals are aimed at NATO and G-8 protestors who will be in town in May. They include increasing fines for those who are arrested for protesting.
Andy Thayer opposed the measures and said these proposals threaten an individual's right to assemble.
"People have made note of the very dramatic increase in penalties. For example, resisting arrest - what is interpreted as ressisting arrest - things like simply going limp," Thayer said.
The proposal still needs approval from the City Council. If passed, the fines for resisting arrest could be increased to $1,000.
VICTORY! City drops charges against a lead organizer of anti-war march
GLN permalink 12-7-2011
Yesterday afternoon we learned that the City of Chicago has dropped the charges against Chicago CodePINK Pat Hunt for two alleged ordinance violations she got at the October 8th march on Obama 2012 Headquarters on the 10th anniversary of the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan.

Pat Hunt
Pat's next court date was to have been today, but that is now CANCELED -- so please help spread the word to anyone you think might have been showing up in solidarity.
Officers apparently targeted Pat as she had signed the permit application on behalf of the Midwest Anti-War Mobilization.
Asked by the administrative law officer as to why they were dropping the charges, the attorney for the City, Scott Sachnoff, said it was because he couldn't schedule the arresting officer to appear in court. "And?," asked the administrative law officer. Note that for proceedings in this court, the burden of proof for the state is so weak that arresting officers do not have to appear.
Our pro-bono National Lawyers Guild attorney, Jeff Frank, asked Sachnoff afterwards for more reasons as to why the City was dropping the charges. Sachnoff responded that it was because Pat didn't actually commit the infractions that were the flimsy basis for the charges -- she didn't temporarily affix a banner to a statue, and she didn't push the sound cart which was supposedly an unauthorized "vehicle."

Jeff Frank (foreground)
Frank told Sachnoff that the City has to knock off these BS charges, as using flimsy alleged ordinance violations as a cover for harassment is a 1st amendment violation. Sachnoff responded that "You know, this is just practice for G8/NATO."
Many thanks to both Pat Hunt and Jeff Frank for not backing down, and for standing up for the rights of all us!

Sunday's Protest Canceled, but Cardinal George's "Apology" to Gays Doesn't Get to the Heart of the Matter
GLN permalink 1-7-2012

Even though the Gay Liberation Network finds the "apology" of Francis George woefully inadequate, we nevertheless agree to call off the protest scheduled for January 8 (tomorrow, Sunday) at Holy Name Cathedral. While taking this action, we highlight our sharp disagreement with some LGBT groups which previously backed the protest and now bubble over with undeserved praise for Cardinal George.
Francis George said in his "apology" that he never meant to smear "all gays and lesbians" with the KKK analogy. So, by implication, and by earlier statements, we take it that George did intend to liken some gays to the Klan, particularly some gay activists. In fact, his original Klan remark was directed at something he vaguely called the "gay liberation movement." This sounds like a specific reference to our organization, the Gay Liberation Network, which he has previously singled out for attack when we have had the audacity to picket the Church hierarchy, including himself, in front of Holy Name Cathedral (George's charges against us for being "anti-Catholic" have always been disingenuous and incendiary because he knows very well: Our disagreement is with him and other church leaders, not with the Catholic laity which, in poll after poll, backs equal rights for gays and lesbians).
In his apology, George claimed further that his KKK analogy was "motivated by fear for the church's liberty." This, too, is completely disingenuous. No one was challenging the church's "liberty," unless by this George means something like the right of the Catholic Church hierarchy to be free from frank and open criticism for its advocacy of discrimination against women and gays.
Finally, and most importantly---and missed by those individuals and groups who are now heaping undeserved praise on the Cardinal -- Francis George's "apology" contained not a word about the church leadership's long-standing and aggressive opposition to all equal rights legislation for LGBT people, nationally and in the state of Illinois.
George's anti-gay animus did not begin by his comparison of gay activists to the KKK. When the Catholic Church leadership, including George, ceases doing everything it can to oppose our equal participation in society, then we can accept an apology from that leadership.
While canceling the January 8 protest, we are redoubling our efforts to secure participation in the Freedom to Marry Day demonstration scheduled for Sunday, February 12 at 10:30 AM in front of Holy Name Cathedral, 735 N. State Street, Chicago.
Letters: Cardinal George
Extended for the online edition of Windy City Times - LINK
2012-01-04
READ MORE LETTERS HERE:
GLN permalink 1-4-2012
By George
Letter to the editor:
In asserting that LGBT-rights activists are akin to fascists, Chicago's Catholic Archbishop Francis George has crossed the line from the intemperate to the outrageous. His recent remarks would be silly if they weren't so dangerous, coming from a highly placed and influential prelate.
In what is presumably an attack on the Gay Liberation Network (GLN), which has demonstrated several times against him, he asserted that "some in the gay liberation" are the equivalent of the KKK because they are "anti-Catholic." Further, he maintained that if the Pride Parade next summer passes a Catholic church during service, it will be an attack on Catholicism. Really? (It's instructive that George has never made this complaint about the huge Chicago Marathon crowds, which gather annually on a Sunday morning when the race passes several Catholic churches during services.)
George's anti-LGBT animus is well known, and he never misses an opportunity to attack our movement. It should not need mentioning that George, who plays the victim card and continually paints us as the aggressors, chooses time and again to ignore the inconvenient fact that Gay Liberation Network's argument is with the anti-gay bigotry of the Church hierarchythe spiteful rhetoric and advocacy of anti-gay discrimination by people like George and his minions.
We know that the Catholic laity is often supportive of LGBTs and our rights while the church leaders are not, and this is both threatening to the latter and a challenge. Their attacks against us are just as much an effort to win support from their parishioners as they are to score points against our movement.
We oppose the Catholic hierarchy because it promotes bigotry against us, both from the pulpit and in the media. We oppose it, and have demonstrated in the streets against the hierarchy because it has steadfastly stood in the way of every advance for LGBT rights in Illinois for more than a decade, from the Illinois Human Rights Act and the Chicago and Cook County anti-discrimination ordinances to the civil-unions bill passed last spring.
Despite these gains, LGBTs still lack full legal equality in Illinois, like the right to marry and the attendant benefits and recognition that this entails. Beyond legal equality, we lack LGBT-affirming education in all of our public schools and programs addressing the unique needs of homeless LGBT youth.
In the battles for these gains, if the past is any guide, George and the rest of the Catholic hierarchy will be our steadfast enemies. Therefore, unlike the Democratic politicians who try to appease the Catholic leadership and LGBTs at the same timeending with muddled support for LGBT rights, at bestwe will clearly denounce George's anti-LGBT bigotry at every opportunity. That is why this next Valentine's Day, we invite all who support LGBT rights and liberation to join GLN at our annual Freedom to Marry Day demonstration in front of Holy Name Cathedral. (More info is available at http:// www.gayliberation.net.) ;
Gay Liberation Network
Opposing NATO and the G8
Why LGBTQs Should Be Involved...
GLN permalink 11-27-2011
Next May 2012 Chicago will host two huge, international confabs. Leaders of the NATO military alliance and the "G8," a group of eight of the largest industrial economies, will gather here.
The G8 is a summit of economic powers that have led the charge for give-aways to corporations and attacks on working people's living standards. NATO is a Cold War relic that the United States has refurbished to give a veneer of international support for military attacks from Libya to Afghanistan.
A meeting by either of these two notorious organizations would be reason enough for large protests. But they are much more so now that Chicago in May, 2012 will see them both meeting in the same city, at the same time, for the first time in over three decades.
Many thousands of social justice activists will undoubtedly converge on Chicago in protest. But why, specifically, should LGBTQ (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer) people get involved in protests against G8 and NATO? What do militarism and economic austerity have to do with us?
First, the NATO and G8 leaders are arguably, in Martin Luther King, Jr.'s words, "the greatest purveyors of violence in the world today," leading to wars and economic austerity measures that cause harm to millions of people each year. Militarism, with its celebration of blunt force, authoritarianism, and repugnance for stereotypically "soft" or "feminine" values like empathy, mercy, and compassion, is an implicit attack on alternative sexualities and gender identities. "Don't ask, don't tell" may mean some extra LGB cadres for U.S. military domination of other nations, but the contempt for real democracy and personal autonomy, including in the spheres of sexuality and gender identity, will remain.
Second, LGBTQ people often expect, and appeal to, other oppressed groups in the United States and elsewhere to link up with us in our struggles for justice. But such appeals fall stillborn if such linkage is not reciprocal. That is, how can we as sexual and gender minorities, expect others---pacifists, socialists, immigrants, racial minorities, Muslims, anti-war and environmental activists---to join us in solidarity for our freedom unless we are prepared to march and rally with them in their struggles?
Which brings us to a third and related point. Most LGBTQs are part of these "other" minorities. Austerity and militarism impact LGBTQ folks directly, just as they do everyone else. Every dollar that bails out a bank or pays for military occupation is one less dollar to meet the legitimate employment, housing, transportation, medical, and education needs of LGBTQs.
Since 9/11, the US military budget has nearly doubled. Spending on current and past wars now consumes 67% of the federal budget. Yet, in the budget debate, both Obama and Congress were agreed that military spending would be largely spared sharp spending cuts, and what cuts there will be will mostly affect veteran benefits, not the cost of current or future wars.
In addition, although the cost to bail out Wall Street in 2008 will never be known precisely, most economists say it exceeds a trillion dollars, not to mention the lost income that comes from massive unemployment, production shutdowns, and the credit squeeze caused by the Wall Street debacle. If "too-big-to-fail" banks were again to totter on the edge, there is every reason to expect that Washington would once again ride to their rescue at the cost of another trillion dollars diverted from working families to the already well-off.
Finally, President Obama with great fanfare recently signed a proclamation that declared that henceforth no serious abusers of LGBT rights elsewhere in the world will be allowed to enter the United States. But will the President enforce this pledge when it comes to stopping G8 visits to Chicago by the leaders of Russia and China, two countries with notorious records of attacks on our rights? We hardly think so.
When Obama reveals next May that this "commitment" to human rights is a cruel joke, what should be the appropriate and principled LGBTQ response to such hypocrisy and chicanery?
There is only one:
Stand up and fight back -- oppose the G8/NATO summits in Chicago in May 2012!
To get involved in organizing LGBTQ-themed actions against the G8/NATO summits, please email LGBTliberation@aol.com

|
|